To view the original post Steve is referencing, click here.
There are
several themes in your article;
a) The use or abuse of automation
tools
b) The propensity to buy followers
c) Reconnect to the roots of social
As
mentioned in my Tweet, it’s a challenging article, particularly to those people
who; Don’t know what automation tools (can) do; Care less about buying
followers in this acquisitive/disposable age; Really just don’t care what the
roots of social are (or were)
I agree
with you that the use of automation tools to send out ‘regular’ postings would
appear to be a reasonable way to keep in touch with ones audience e.g sending
out a newsletter on the same day each week, providing this kind of thing is done with a
personal touch (being in the 'present')
The use
of ‘blind’ automation i.e without behavioural rules of some form, appears to be
nothing more than a repeat of email spamming mechanisms. This was never good in
terms of etiquette or good manners, but then sadly it still doesn’t stop people doing
it for whatever reason (I'm sure there are many)
This
suggests that it is really people who need to become more sophisticated and discerning in their usage of the various tools, and particularly the automation software they use (in a
Social Media context).
It’s
not
just down to the tools though. In their own right, they’re just ‘dumb’
responders to the ‘audience’ who set them up and use them (for whatever
purpose they choose).
This brings
us then to the old subject of human behaviour,
particularly given the explosion in use of social media across (now) multiple devices
(a much more significant difference to the basic Mobile phone revolution which occurred
around 10 to 15 years ago)
Different
groups demand different things from the tools or capability. Some people naturally
see the tools as genuine enablers of positive social behaviour i.e good conversation.
Others have rightly seen the various social media tools as enablers of
different ways of working which will allow them to make a good ethical living.
And
then
there are those who see these things as just another way to make a fast
buck. At that end of the spectrum, would they really care whether we
step away
from the roots of social (when quite frankly in any world they would
probably
behave in the same way).
In simple
terms, it seems that Social Media tools can certainly transform the way we live
and do business. That’s great/positive in so many ways.
However,
now that the whole genre of social tools are beginning to mature (I stress the
word ‘beginning’), more intelligent
forms of usage (from their audience) would be expected, providing they do actually
give a 'hoot'.
And
it is
this aspect of caring that gets me. Some are simply not aware of others
concerns about
how social media is used, some feel no shame whatever they do, some see
this as a given right to behave how they wish, and
quite honestly they won’t be stopped because Social Media now allows
some of the less savoury aspects of human behaviour to rise to the
surface faster and with more intensity than we saw in the past.
The above sounds awful, unless someone comes up with an
alternative, because of course we know they exist (as they always will)
That
alternative requires articles like yours to get people to actually ‘think’ a
little more, not just about the tools they use, but the reasons they use them
in the first place, and critically the behaviours/manners/concern they exhibit when they use the things.
If at the
very least people read articles like yours, and just think a little more before hitting a keypad, let alone using a
particular tool, then a small vestige of progress has been made. This may mean the
audience is actually considering what the very roots of social were originally
intended to be (that is of course if anyone truly remembers what those roots
were, whether these matter at all, and more importantly whether people actually
care and are willing to consider or change their behaviour).
- Steve Martin*
What do you think? Where is the line between automated and real-time social media? Comment!
What do you think? Where is the line between automated and real-time social media? Comment!
*Steve Martin was part of the Mobile Telecoms
story for 5 years in the UK with Virgin Mobile. As part of that
model (which then fuelled enterprises in different continents), he saw
the quite phenomenal growth in products and usage (voice/sms) over a
very short period of time. Back then of course, ideas were ahead of
technology (hardware and software capability). Now, technology has
essentially caught up, hence the burst upwards into the social media
(applications and usage) sphere. At least, that's his
perspective. Find out more about Steve --> http://about.me/leomcgirr
No comments:
Post a Comment